Peugeot 208 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 208 engine produces 8 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 208 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| Peugeot 208 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 208 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 208 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 208 is 10 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 208 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 311 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1076 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 208 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`553 kg | 1`588 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`009 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 573 kg | 579 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |