Peugeot 208 2012 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Peugeot 208 torque is 30 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 208 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 208 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 311 litres | 443 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 208 has 132 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 208 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |