Peugeot 208 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 208 engine produces 37 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 208 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 3.5 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 208 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 208 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 208 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1076 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Peugeot 208 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 74 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`050 kg | 1`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 455 kg | |
| Peugeot 208 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Peugeot 208 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 208 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |