Peugeot 208 2012 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 208 engine produces 22 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 208 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Peugeot 208 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 208 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen C3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 208 is 31 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 208 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1076 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 208 has 158 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 208 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`527 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 208 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |