Peugeot 208 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 0.9 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 208 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 300 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 14.5 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.6 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Peugeot 208 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Peugeot 208 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Peugeot 208 is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 208 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 311 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1076 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 208 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 208 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`613 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |