Peugeot 208 2012 vs Renault Clio 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Peugeot 208 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 0.9 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 208 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 300 NM | 135 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 16.2 seconds | 12.1 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 6.7 | 3.2 - 4.5 | |
|
Peugeot 208 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Peugeot 208 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Peugeot 208 is 31 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 208 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 311 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1152 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 208 has 132 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 208 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 208 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`596 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 208 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |