Peugeot 207 2007 vs Peugeot 307 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 207 engine produces 65 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 93 NM more than Peugeot 307. Thanks to more power Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 207 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Peugeot 308 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is smaller. Peugeot 207 is 28 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | 2211 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Peugeot 207 has 183 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 953 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 207 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 207 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |