Peugeot 207 2007 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Peugeot 207 engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 207 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Peugeot 207 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
Peugeot 207 is 26 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Peugeot 207 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`758 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | high | |
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |