Peugeot 207 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 207 engine produces 34 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 207 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Caddy, Skoda Fabia, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 207 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Roomster 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Roomster 2010 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.61 m | |
| Peugeot 207 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Peugeot 207 has 143 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`766 | 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |