Peugeot 207 2009 vs Peugeot 206 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Peugeot 207 engine produces 10 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is larger. Peugeot 207 is 34 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 10 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | 992 litres | |
|
Peugeot 207 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 207 has 92 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 266 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 207 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`567 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 207 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 207, so Peugeot 207 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |