Peugeot 207 2009 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 207 engine produces 45 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is smaller. Peugeot 207 is 31 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Peugeot 207 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Peugeot 207 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`642 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |