Peugeot 207 2006 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 207 engine produces 9 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 207, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
| |