Peugeot 207 2009 vs Peugeot 207 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Peugeot 207 2009 engine produces 11 HP more power than Peugeot 207 2006, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Peugeot 207 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 2009 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207 2006, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 2009 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 207 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Peugeot 207 2006 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 207 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 207 2009 is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot 207 2006, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | 923 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 2009 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Peugeot 207 2006, which means Peugeot 207 2009 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |