Peugeot 207 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 207 engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 207 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3 Picasso | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Fabia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 207 is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 11 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
923 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Peugeot 207 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Peugeot 207 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`144 kg | 1`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 496 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |