Peugeot 207 2009 vs Peugeot 307 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 207 engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 307 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is smaller. Peugeot 207 is 39 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | 2211 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Peugeot 207 has 250 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 1288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`601 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 207 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Peugeot 207, so Peugeot 207 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |