Peugeot 2008 2023 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Peugeot 2008) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 22 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 40 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 434 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1467 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`740 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |