Peugeot 2008 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 70 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 15.9 kWh/100km | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1467 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 2008 has 28 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |