Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 | 3.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`749 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |