Peugeot 2008 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 2008) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Karoq) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 434 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1467 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 163 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`929 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`235 kg | 1`318 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 535 kg | 611 kg | |
| Peugeot 2008 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |