Peugeot 2008 2019 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 16 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.0 | |
| Peugeot 2008 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 2008 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.60 m | |
| Peugeot 2008 is 9 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1467 litres | 1305 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 17 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`752 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |