Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2016 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 2008 2016 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`727 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |