Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Mini Countryman 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 118 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 40 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.9 | |
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Used also on Mini Cooper | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`805 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |