Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 43 HP less power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Ford EcoSport. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.65 m | |
| Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |