Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 2008 has 99 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 364 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |