Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 48 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 2008 has 28 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. The Skoda Yeti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Peugeot 2008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |