Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 13 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 55 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Despite less power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 1`904 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |