Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012

 
Peugeot 2008
2013 - 2016
Renault Captur
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 92 HP110 HP
Torque: 230 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11 seconds
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 2008 engine produces 18 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.03.7
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 2008 could require 45 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1250 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1250 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.12 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.56 m1.57 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres377 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1194 litres1235 litres
Renault Captur has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 41 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Captur, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6841`763
Safety:
Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

average
Renault Captur has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 68007400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 2008 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Renault Captur has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv