Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Mini Countryman 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Used also on Mini Cooper | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 2008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |