Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
| Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 85 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
| Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
| The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 855 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 6.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.80 m | |
| Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 141 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down | 1194 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 2008 has 209 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The Jeep Wrangler may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: | Peugeot 2008 has 
 | Jeep Wrangler has 
 | |
