Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 2 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
| Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`666 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |