Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 58 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 12 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Peugeot 2008 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`919 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |