Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 108 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 2008 has 99 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |