Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 422 litres | |
| Peugeot 2008 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 772 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |