Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |