Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |