Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 88 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 10 cm shorter than the Jeep Renegade, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Peugeot 2008 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |