Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 58 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 2008 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |