Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Seat Arona 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 130 HP | 95 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 155 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15.4 seconds | 8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 4.9 | 3.7 - 6.3 | |
|
Peugeot 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Arona. On average, Peugeot 2008 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 2 cm longer than the Seat Arona, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Seat Arona has
| |