Peugeot 2008 2016 vs Renault Captur 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 0.9 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 130 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 140 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15.4 seconds | 8.2 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 4.9 | 3.6 - 5.6 | |
|
Peugeot 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Captur. On average, Peugeot 2008 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 105 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`731 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |