Peugeot 108 2014 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 96 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 108 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 108 engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, but torque is 1 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Despite less power, Peugeot 108 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 108 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 108 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 108 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 108 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 108 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 108 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.48 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 108 is 9 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Peugeot 108 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 108 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 108 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Peugeot 108 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 108 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |