Peugeot 107 2006 vs Peugeot 1007 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 107 engine produces 14 HP less power than Peugeot 1007, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Peugeot 1007. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 107 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.1 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 107 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007, which means that by driving the Peugeot 107 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 107 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 1007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen C1 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 3.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Peugeot 107 is smaller. Peugeot 107 is 30 cm shorter than the Peugeot 1007, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 107 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 154 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 1192 litres | |
| Peugeot 107 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 1007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 1007 (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 1007, which means Peugeot 107 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`245 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 107 has
|
Peugeot 1007 has
| |