Peugeot 107 2005 vs Ford KA 1997

 
Peugeot 107
2005 - 2008
Ford KA
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 68 HP60 HP
Torque: 93 NM105 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds15.4 seconds
Peugeot 107 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 107 engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford KA, but torque is 12 NM less than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Peugeot 107 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.66.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.5 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 107 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Peugeot 107 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 107 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway760 km on highway
630 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km320'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford KA engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 20 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108Used also on Ford Fiesta
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.43 m3.62 m
Width: 1.63 m1.63 m
Height: 1.47 m1.37 m
Peugeot 107 is 19 cm shorter than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 107 is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 139 litres186 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
751 litres724 litres
Peugeot 107 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 107 (by 27 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford KA.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`265
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Peugeot 107 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1600800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 107 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Ford KA has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv