Peugeot 107 2008 vs Ford KA 2008

 
Peugeot 107
2008 - 2012
Ford KA
2008 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP69 HP
Torque: 93 NM102 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds13.1 seconds
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 107 engine produces 1 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 107 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.55.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 107 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Peugeot 107 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 107 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway790 km on highway
670 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.43 m3.62 m
Width: 1.66 m1.66 m
Height: 1.47 m1.51 m
Peugeot 107 is smaller.
Peugeot 107 is 19 cm shorter than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 107 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 139 litres224 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Ford KA has more luggage space.
Peugeot 107 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA.
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford KA.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1901`320
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Peugeot 107 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26002200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 107 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Ford KA has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv