Peugeot 107 2012 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 107 engine produces 22 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 107 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 107 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 107 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 107 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Peugeot 107 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 107 is 63 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 107 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 107 has 161 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 107 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 107 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 107 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |