Peugeot 107 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 107 engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Citigo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 107 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 107 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 107 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 107 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 107 is 13 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Peugeot 107 has 112 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 107 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |