Peugeot 107 2005 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 - 68 HP | 50 - 118 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 130 NM | 74 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 - 15.6 seconds | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.6 | 5.3 - 8.8 | |
Peugeot 107 petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Peugeot 107 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.43 m | 3.68 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.59 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.38 m | |
Peugeot 107 is 25 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 107 is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 953 litres | |
Peugeot 106 has more luggage space. Peugeot 107 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 202 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Peugeot 107 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`245 | ~ 1`328 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 107 has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |