Peugeot 106 1996 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 106 and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Peugeot 106 torque is 4 NM more than Renault Clio. Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.6 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 106 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |