Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 106 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 106 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 206 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Citroen C2, Peugeot 1007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |