Peugeot 106 1996 vs Toyota Yaris 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 106 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 106 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2002 1.4 engine: Toyota introduced this 1.4-liter turbocharged diesel engine in 2001, and production continued until 2017. It features a Bosch Common Rail fuel injection system, initially equipped with electromagnetic injectors until 2008. These were later replaced by non-repairable ... More about Toyota Yaris 2002 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.50 m | |
| Peugeot 106 is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |