Peugeot 106 1996 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 7 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 106 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |